EVM chains are blockchains that have implemented the Ethereum Virtual Machine, which is the computation engine that executes smart contracts on the Ethereum network. This allows them to run Ethereum-based smart contracts and dApps, creating a vast ecosystem of compatible blockchains.
EVM compatibility means a blockchain can execute Ethereum smart contracts and dApps without requiring significant code modifications. This is achieved by adhering to similar consensus mechanisms, transaction formats, and programming languages (like Solidity) as Ethereum.
The EVM is a decentralized, Turing-complete virtual machine that acts as the runtime environment for smart contracts on Ethereum. It processes transactions and updates the blockchain's state according to the rules defined in smart contracts, using "gas" to manage computational resources.
LIFO data structure for temporary storage during computation
Purpose: Manages operands for EVM operations
Temporary, byte-addressable area for data during execution
Purpose: Volatile storage cleared between function calls
Persistent key-value store for permanent contract data
Purpose: Most expensive but permanent data storage
Low-level instructions compiled from high-level languages
Purpose: Executable code that the EVM processes
Prominent examples include Ethereum itself, BNB Smart Chain (BSC), Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche (C-Chain), Optimism, Fantom, and Base. Each offers different trade-offs between security, speed, and cost.
The original EVM blockchain and home of smart contracts
Gas Token
ETH
Avg Gas Cost
$5-50
TPS
15
Consensus
Proof of Stake
Key Features
Optimistic rollup scaling Ethereum with lower fees
Gas Token
ETH
Avg Gas Cost
$0.50-5
TPS
4,000
Consensus
Optimistic Rollup
Key Features
Optimistic rollup with focus on simplicity and Ethereum equivalence
Gas Token
ETH
Avg Gas Cost
$0.50-5
TPS
2,000
Consensus
Optimistic Rollup
Key Features
Coinbase's Layer 2 built on Optimism stack
Gas Token
ETH
Avg Gas Cost
$0.10-2
TPS
2,000
Consensus
Optimistic Rollup
Key Features
Ethereum-compatible sidechain with PoS consensus
Gas Token
MATIC
Avg Gas Cost
$0.01-0.50
TPS
7,000
Consensus
Proof of Stake
Key Features
Binance's EVM-compatible chain with fast blocks and low fees
Gas Token
BNB
Avg Gas Cost
$0.10-1
TPS
2,000
Consensus
Proof of Staked Authority
Key Features
EVM-compatible chain in Avalanche's subnet architecture
Gas Token
AVAX
Avg Gas Cost
$0.50-5
TPS
4,500
Consensus
Avalanche Consensus
Key Features
High-performance EVM-compatible chain with DAG consensus
Gas Token
FTM
Avg Gas Cost
$0.01-0.10
TPS
10,000+
Consensus
Lachesis (DAG)
Key Features
EVM-compatible chains address Ethereum's scalability challenges through various approaches. Layer 2 solutions inherit Ethereum's security while offering better performance, while alternative Layer 1s make different trade-offs between decentralization, speed, and cost.
Aspect | Ethereum | Layer 2 Solutions | Alternative L1s |
---|---|---|---|
Transaction Throughput | ~15 TPS | 1,000-4,000 TPS | 2,000-10,000+ TPS |
Transaction Costs | $5-50+ during congestion | $0.10-5 | $0.01-1 |
Finality Time | 12-15 seconds | 1-10 seconds | 1-5 seconds |
Security Model | Highest (native PoS) | Inherits Ethereum security | Independent security models |
For developers: ease of porting dApps, access to established tools (Truffle, Hardhat, Remix), large developer community, and network effects. EVM compatibility significantly reduces development time and costs while providing access to mature infrastructure.
Well-defined execution environment with predictable behavior
Benefit: Contracts execute consistently across different EVM chains
Access to established development tools and frameworks
Benefit: Remix, Hardhat, Truffle, and extensive debugging tools
Vast community with abundant resources and support
Benefit: Tutorials, forums, open-source libraries, and knowledge sharing
Deploy existing Ethereum dApps with minimal modifications
Benefit: Quick expansion to new chains and user bases
Tap into Ethereum's established ecosystem and composability
Benefit: Integration with existing DeFi protocols and infrastructure
Use Solidity, Vyper, and other Ethereum-compatible languages
Benefit: Leverage existing skills and code libraries
For users: access to a wider range of dApps, potentially lower fees and faster transactions on compatible L1s/L2s, and easier asset transfer between EVM chains. Users benefit from familiar interfaces and expanded opportunities across multiple networks.
Access to diverse ecosystem across multiple chains
Benefit: DeFi, NFT, gaming, and other applications
Same wallets and interfaces across EVM chains
Benefit: MetaMask and other wallets work seamlessly
Alternative chains often offer better performance
Benefit: More affordable and accessible dApp usage
Common standards simplify cross-chain movements
Benefit: ERC-20 tokens work across EVM chains with bridges
Limitations can include Ethereum's inherent scalability issues being inherited, technical complexity in development, large storage requirements for full nodes, and potential centralization concerns. Non-EVM chains may offer more design flexibility or performance for specific use cases.
EVM architecture wasn't designed for massive throughput
Impact: Performance bottlenecks and high gas costs during congestion
Solidity and smart contract development can be error-prone
Impact: Steep learning curve and potential security vulnerabilities
Full nodes require significant storage for blockchain data
Impact: Barriers to running nodes, potential centralization
Some EVM chains sacrifice decentralization for performance
Impact: Reduced censorship resistance and security guarantees
EVM compatibility limits architectural experimentation
Impact: Non-EVM chains may offer superior performance for specific use cases
EVM compatibility fosters interoperability, allows developers to easily deploy existing Ethereum dApps on new chains, leverages Ethereum's large developer community and tools, and can offer solutions for scalability and lower transaction costs. This creates powerful network effects that benefit the entire blockchain ecosystem.
Enables functional compatibility between chains, allowing dApps to work across multiple networks with minimal modifications.
New chains can tap into Ethereum's existing developer ecosystem, tools, and knowledge base, accelerating adoption.
Layer 2 solutions and alternative L1s provide faster, cheaper alternatives while maintaining Ethereum compatibility.
EVM chains are blockchains that have implemented the Ethereum Virtual Machine, which is the computation engine that executes smart contracts on the Ethereum network. This allows them to run Ethereum-based smart contracts and dApps.
EVM compatibility means a blockchain can execute Ethereum smart contracts and dApps without requiring significant code modifications, often by adhering to similar consensus mechanisms, transaction formats, and programming languages (like Solidity) as Ethereum.
EVM compatibility fosters interoperability, allows developers to easily deploy existing Ethereum dApps on new chains, leverages Ethereum's large developer community and tools, and can offer solutions for scalability and lower transaction costs while benefiting from Ethereum's established ecosystem.
The EVM is a decentralized, Turing-complete virtual machine that acts as the runtime environment for smart contracts on Ethereum. It processes transactions and updates the blockchain's state according to the rules defined in smart contracts, using 'gas' to manage computational resources.
For developers: ease of porting dApps, access to established tools (Truffle, Hardhat, Remix), large developer community, and network effects. For users: access to a wider range of dApps, potentially lower fees and faster transactions on compatible L1s/L2s, and easier asset transfer between EVM chains.
Limitations can include Ethereum's inherent scalability issues (high gas costs, slower speeds) being inherited to some extent, technical complexity in development, large storage requirements for full nodes, and potential centralization concerns if a compatible chain has few validators.
Prominent examples include Ethereum itself, BNB Smart Chain (BSC), Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche (C-Chain), Optimism, Fantom, and Base.
Gas is a unit that measures the computational effort required for operations in the EVM. Users pay gas fees to compensate network validators for processing transactions. Gas prevents network abuse by making computationally intensive operations expensive and incentivizes validators to secure the network.
EVM compatibility creates network effects by allowing developers to leverage Ethereum's mature tooling and large developer community. It enables easy dApp portability, reduces development costs, and provides users with access to a wider range of applications across multiple chains.
EVM-compatible chains benefit from Ethereum's ecosystem but may inherit its limitations. Non-EVM chains like Solana or Polkadot can innovate with new architectures and potentially offer better performance, but sacrifice direct compatibility with Ethereum's vast ecosystem.
EVM chains provide a standardized environment for smart contract execution, enabling developers to build once and deploy everywhere. While EVM compatibility offers significant benefits through network effects and ecosystem leverage, it also comes with trade-offs including inherited limitations and potential innovation constraints. The choice between EVM-compatible and non-EVM chains depends on specific use cases, with EVM chains excelling in ecosystem access and developer familiarity, while non-EVM chains may offer superior performance for specialized applications.
Your AI teacher for blockchain, cryptocurrency, and decentralized finance. Ask me anything!
Popular topics:
Connect your wallet to start learning about crypto and DeFi